[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [linrad] Linrad and Mandrake 9.2
- Subject: Re: [linrad] Linrad and Mandrake 9.2
- From: Richard Bown <richard.bown@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2004 19:59:07 +0000
Richard
the svgalib was last distributed on MDK8.2, you DO NOT have to be a club
member to go on to the download site to gain access to it.
If you use easy urpmi you can set up the MDK8.2 as a source the n all
the rpms contained in MDK8.2 can be display from the control center.
to find the easy urpmi site just google for it.
I have svgalib 1.4.3mdk on this system.
Watch your syslog when you try to start an app that needs svgalibs , it
will give you an idea where the symlinks need to be set.
HTH
Richard
On Tue, 2004-02-17 at 16:31, Joe Fitzgerald wrote:
> Before you give up on Mandrake 9.2, I think you can dig into your problem a little more and come to a solution. You may need a symlink between libvga.so.1 and libvga and libvgagl.so.1 and libvgagl ... I had a similar problem on Red Hat.
>
> Here is a post from a long time ago before I learned about symlinks. It will also fix the problem, but it is not as elegant.
>
> *****
>
> As long as we are on the subject of libraries ...
>
> I attempted to compile linrad 00.51 on my Redhat 8.0 system, but got an
> error message that the linker could not find the libraries specified by
> -lvga and -lvgagl. After learning a bit about how gcc works with ld, I
> found I could compile by changing in the Makefile
>
>
> gcc -olinrad -lvga -lvgagl \
> <rest of command deleted for brevity>
>
> to
>
> gcc -olinrad /usr/lib/libvga.so.1 /usr/lib/libvgal.so.1 \
> <rest of command deleted for brevity>
>
> I have not figured out why ld is not searching for the libraries in the
> standard path with the original Makefile generated by configure.
>
> -Joe KM1P
> ******
>
>
> > I got mine from one of the Linux magazines at the newsagent. It seems
> > Mandrake is starting to get away a bit fom the Open Source ethos towards
> > a commercial model - how is supporting a commercial entity suporting the
> > Linux community?
>
> Mandrake has been and continues to be a big contributor to the community, but they have discovered that when they give _all_ their stuff away, they cannot make enough money to pay their employees enough so they can eat, buy clothing and find a place to live. You speak of the "Open Source ethos" ... unfortunately that is a rather vague term ... it means something different to pretty much everybody. I get the sense that you would like to get all your software without paying for it ... which is fine, but you will likely have to jump through a few more hoops than those that choose to pay for a fully QC'ed distro. That's part of the Linux adventure. Fortunately, there are lots of folks out there that are willing to help.
>
>
>
>
> -Joe KM1P
>
>
>
> Richard Hosking wrote:
>
> > I have tried various options and got the libraries libvgagl.so.1 and
> > libvga.so.1 into /usr/lib/ by copying them directly. I gather this is
> > not sufficient, however, and I cant get the full package to compile.
> > When I rpm linrad, it says it doesnt see these files
> > Oh well - guess I will go and spend my money.
> >
> > svgalib doesnt seem to be a package included in the Mandrake 9.2 distro.
> > I got mine from one of the Linux magazines at the newsagent. It seems
> > Mandrake is starting to get away a bit fom the Open Source ethos towards
> > a commercial model - how is supporting a commercial entity suporting the
> > Linux community?
> >
> > Richard
> >
> > Joe Fitzgerald wrote:
> >
> >> Richard Hosking wrote:
> >>
> >>>
> >>> I would be happy to consider payment for an rpm if it is supporting
> >>> the Linux community. Is Mandrakesoft a commercial entity?
> >>>
> >>>
> >> They are a commercial entity, and supporting them is definitely
> >> supporting Linux community.
> >> -Joe KM1P
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> >
--
Richard Bown <richard.bown@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
LINRADDARNIL