[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [linrad] Re: [hflink] AOR versus LinRad [Was:] Re: PCALE does not recognize *.qrg file
- Subject: Re: [linrad] Re: [hflink] AOR versus LinRad [Was:] Re: PCALE does not recognize *.qrg file
- From: "John Harrison, NI1B" <jmh6@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Sun, 7 Sep 2003 06:57:26 -0400 (EDT)
Hi Doc,
Why don't we just do it !!
john, ni1b
On 6 Sep 2003, Colburn wrote:
> It would seem that I ran two things together in my mind, perhaps wishful
> thinking. The Linrad article was a breakthrough in using the app with a
> common rig, I had also been looking into Pactor III and digitized audio
> for Amateur Radio. Sure seems as though all three might be rolled into
> one! ;-)
>
> Sorry ... sigh ... Will keep hoping! dmc
>
> On Sat, 2003-09-06 at 11:32, n7mjw wrote:
> > Am I missing something... The AOR box is a 2400 bd modem and vo-
> > coder in a box. Its not a dsp noise box. The Lin Rad thing looks
> > like a low IF or audio frequency signal banwidth, noise, DSP
> > device. These arent the same thing. Dave
>
> --
> --
> ~~~
> o['|']o
> \~/
> | ```@ {Thanks! & 73 doc kd4e}
> | |__/
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> Why Amateur Radio? Electronics, communicating, and helping others.
> Why Linux? Better than Microsoft & Apple, user controlled, it works.
> |
> Jesus === Freedom
> |
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> Buy/Sell & no inappropriate ads & pop-ups:
> www.christian-auctions.com www.faithbid.com
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>
LINRADDARNIL