[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [linrad] ALSA vs OSS ?
- Subject: Re: [linrad] ALSA vs OSS ?
- From:jr1ede@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 28 Jan 2003 01:34:42 +0900
Hello All,
I had paid a full time of weeks for installing ALSA on my Delta 44 but had never
got a success so far.
I know I'm not that expert in Linux but have been a deep fun of Un*x
for more than 15 years.
Who is using ALSA in this community?
What is your Linux distribution, kernel/gcc version, your card?
Would you please spend your time for us to input mini_HOWTO?
Kohjin - JR1EDE
At 01:04 03/01/28 +0900, you wrote:
>
>Bob,
>
>I think the bottom line is:
>
>If OSS Free provides adequate support to your soundcard and works well
>with the applications you intend to use, stay with OSS Free; otherwise,
>you can use OSS or ALSA. Both have advantages and disadvantages which are
>well described at:
>
>http://www.linuxhardware.org/features/01/03/06/179255.shtml
>
>73,
>
>-- Edson, 7n4ncl
>
>On Mon, 27 Jan 2003 bob@xxxxxxx wrote:
>
>>
>> Any comments on ALSA vs OSS by way of
>> experienced based comparison.
>>
>> I'm just getting this stuff together to use
>> with VIA/Athlon MP4 based laptop and tentec
>> RX320 (RH8.0 2.4.20 compiled for Athlon MP4)
>>
>> -bob
>> ah7i
>>
>>
--
Kohjin Yamada - JR1EDE
QTH: PM95tg.12
http://www.jr1ede.org/
LINRADDARNIL