[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Linrad] Re: MAP65 for SDR-IQ
- Subject: [Linrad] Re: MAP65 for SDR-IQ
- From: Edward Cole <acsalaska.net; kl7uw@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2009 18:06:47 -0900
Joe,
I am deffinitely interested. My eme system is H/V switchable in Rx
and Tx independently, so I can tap off 2m in the shack to my DEMI
144/28 + SDR-IQ whihc is connected to the computer via USB-2.0. I
have an earlier version of MAP-65 and winrad and JT-65 all on a Dell
Vostro duo-core2 2.33 Gb computer (win-XP-Pro).
73, Ed
QRV with 2m-8877-600w
At 11:08 AM 2/13/2009, you wrote:
>Hello Moonbouncers,
>
>Many people have asked about a version of MAP65 that could
>be used with the SDR-IQ receiver. I'm happy to report that
>an operational version of "MAP65-IQ" now exists. It should
>be ready soon for testing by others.
>
>You'll recall that MAP65 works together with Linrad in a
>dual polarization or "stereo receive" system. It takes
>advantage of many of Linrad's excellent features -- the
>waterfall displays, noise blanker, dual-channel coherent
>processing, etc. -- as its receiving "front end". Partially
>processed data are sent from Linrad to MAP65, which searches
>for all JT65B signals in a 90 kHz bandwidth, measures the
>polarization angle of each one, and decodes them all. The
>Linrad sample rate must be set to 96000 Hz.
>
>MAP65-IQ differs from the standard MAP65 in respects:
>
>1. MAP65-IQ is intended for use with single-polarization
>systems. (Thus, no polarization matching can be done.)
>
>2. MAP65-IQ uses a slightly different sample rate, 95238.1
>Hz, in order to be compatible with the SDR-IQ hardware.
>
>MAP65-IQ appears to work very well. In one test using the
>H-polarization (horizontal) data from 11 minutes of the 2006
>ARRL EME Contest, MAP65-IQ decodes 82 messages from 24
>different stations spread over the range 144.100 - 144.160
>MHz. For comparison, the standard MAP65 decodes 127
>messages from 36 stations in the same 11 minutes of data,
>using both H and V polarizations. For a rough sensitivity
>calibration, I was using a pair of 2MXP20 yagis when these
>data were recorded.
>
>These results are just what one would expect: the somewhat
>smaller number of messages decoded by MAP65-IQ is a result
>of its having no access to data in the "other" polarization.
>
>In order to make tests of MAP65-IQ you'll need a receiving
>setup with Linrad and an SDR-IQ, and you must be familiar
>with the use of JT65 in WSJT. If you meet these
>requirements and would like to participate in early tests of
>MAP65-IQ, please send me an email with some details.
>
> -- 73, Joe, K1JT
>
>
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Linrad" group.
To post to this group, send email to linrad@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to linrad+unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/linrad?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
LINRADDARNIL