[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Linrad] Re: Leif de Jeremy
- Subject: [Linrad] Re: Leif de Jeremy
- From: Joe Taylor <Princeton.EDU; joe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 16:33:16 -0500
Hi Leif and all,
I am running tests of MAP65-IQ with the following configuration:
1. SDR-IQ into Linrad;
2. Linrad timf2 data via pseudo-network to MAP65-IQ
Linrad and MAP65-IQ run on the same Windows computer.
I have discovered that this system runs best with Linrad at
"Above Normal" priority. It does *not* run well with Linrad
at "High" priority, which is what you get if you have
"Process priority" set to 1 in par_userint.
Does this make sense to you? Would it be good to give the
user this option, either instead of or in addition to "High"
priority?
-- Joe, K1JT
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Linrad" group.
To post to this group, send email to linrad@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to linrad+unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/linrad?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
LINRADDARNIL