[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[linrad] Linrad Network
- Subject: [linrad] Linrad Network
- From: "Joe Barger" <aero.org; barger@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2007 17:22:51 -0700
I've been experimenting with the Linrad Network. All seems well using
options 4, 5, 6, or 7, but when I turn on option 8 (Send timf2) or option 9
(send fft2 transforms) the AFC graph and S meter graphs become very slow and
jerky and the main spectrum and high resolution graphs seem to slow down
some. If I try to "X" out, the screen freezes and I have to close the
window and restart Linrad. CPU utilization is low, so I'm wondering if
something is causing a conflict in the network processing thread for options
8 and 9? I'm using WinXP on a P4 with 1.5G RAM and Linrad 2.35. Consistent
results on my laptop as well. I haven't checked how it behaves under Linux
yet, but I have a hunch it's the same.
I'd like to get option 8 working well since it's used for MAP65 :-) .
Anyone have any ideas?
joe n6kk
PS. I have Linrad and MAP65 working on the same computer and happily
decoding a stored "S" file. The SDR1000/transverter/2x5WL/1500w station is
ready for EME (single polarization, however), but I may not be able to be in
the shack when the moon is up for a few days. I'll also try the SDR-IQ and
see how it compares to the SDR1000.
#############################################################
This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to
the mailing list <linrad@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>.
To unsubscribe, E-mail to: <linrad-off@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to <linrad-digest@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To switch to the INDEX mode, E-mail to <linrad-index@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Send administrative queries to <linrad-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
LINRADDARNIL