[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[linrad] Re: Lynx Two

To: linrad@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [linrad] Re: Lynx Two
From: Alberto di Bene <dibene@xxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 05 May 2004 12:03:55 +0200
In-reply-to: <PFEOIPHIGIHONCFOIOGCMECPECAA.rwmcgwier@xxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <PFEOIPHIGIHONCFOIOGCMECPECAA.rwmcgwier@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Reply-to: linrad@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sender: owner-linrad@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Win98; en-US; rv:1.4) Gecko/20030624 Netscape/7.1 (ax)

Robert McGwier wrote:

>After I
>got ASIO 2.0 support going using PortAudio 19, the Emu and the Lynx
>are outstanding Windows cards.  The Emu 1212M is not yet supported under
>Linux so far as I know and OSS is required for the Lynx 2 /L22.
>
Bob,
  have you measured the frequency response of the EMU-1212M when 
sampling at 192 kHz ?
Reading the specs I found this :
-----
Frequency Response: +/- .05dB, 20Hz - 22kHz
-----
without any mention to the sampling rate....
Have you checked whether the card has a reasonably flat response up to 
96 kHz when
sampling at 192 ?  Thanks.

73  Alberto  I2PHD

LINRADDARNIL

Follow-Ups:
- RE: [linrad] Re: Lynx Two
  - From: Robert McGwier

References:
- RE: [linrad] Lynx Two
  - From: Robert McGwier

Prev by Date: [linrad] RE: BFO @ Version 19
Next by Date: RE: [linrad] Re: Lynx Two
Previous by thread: RE: [linrad] Lynx Two
Next by thread: RE: [linrad] Re: Lynx Two
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread