[linrad] Re: AOR versus LinRad

[Colburn <kd4e@xxxxxxxx>]

I'm not "smart" enough!  Wish I had learned to code better in years
past.

doc

On Sun, 2003-09-07 at 06:57, John Harrison, NI1B wrote:
> Hi Doc,
> 
>    Why don't we just do it !!
> 
>    john, ni1b
> 
> 
> On 6 Sep 2003, Colburn wrote:
> 
> > It would seem that I ran two things together in my mind, perhaps wishful
> > thinking.  The Linrad article was a breakthrough in using the app with a
> > common rig, I had also been looking into Pactor III and digitized audio
> > for Amateur Radio.  Sure seems as though all three might be rolled into
> > one!  ;-) 
> > 
> > Sorry ... sigh ... Will keep hoping!  dmc
> > 
> > On Sat, 2003-09-06 at 11:32, n7mjw wrote:
> > > Am I missing something...  The AOR box is a 2400 bd modem and vo-
> > > coder in a box.  Its not a dsp noise box.  The Lin Rad thing looks 
> > > like a low IF or audio frequency signal banwidth, noise, DSP 
> > > device.  These arent the same thing.  Dave
 
-- 
--
  ~~~
o['|']o   
  \~/   
   | ```@ {Thanks! & 73 doc kd4e}
  | |__/
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Why Amateur Radio?  Electronics, communicating, and helping others.
Why Linux?  Better than Microsoft & Apple, user controlled, it works.
        |
Jesus  ===  Freedom
        |
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Buy/Sell & no inappropriate ads & pop-ups: 
www.christian-auctions.com  www.faithbid.com
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

LINRADDARNIL